Connect with us

BGT 2024

Why Rohit might be better off batting at No. 6?

Published

on

He is being encouraged to return to opening by the talking heads of Indian cricket but Rohit Sharma may just avoid being swayed by the proverbial outside noise and stick to the number six slot for at least the third Test against Australia in Brisbane, starting this weekend.

Rohit, who was on paternity break during the opening Test and scored 3 and 6 on his return during the pink ball Test at the Adelaide Oval, is facing calls for his return to the top in the batting order in place of K L Rahul, who too had an indifferent game in Adelaide after his heroics in Perth.

If one looks at Rohit’s statistics in SENA (South Africa, England, New Zealand and Australia), across all batting positions in 46 completed innings, he averages a shade less than 30 while in 20 innings as opener, he scores at 37.8 thanks largely to the successful English summer of 2021.

A BCCI Level 3 coach, who has previously worked at the National Cricket Academy, on technical aspects of the swashbuckler’s game, he dissected Rohit’s technique to explain why opening might not be a good option for the Indian captain at the moment.

“Rohit Sharma has had very limited footwork all his career, even when he was in his prime. Obviously, at 37 and half years, the reflexes have slowed down and he is picking the length a trifle late,” the qualified batting coach told PTI.

“The same Rohit will look very different in the IPL where you might still find him scoring a 35-ball-70 for Mumbai Indians with opposition having at least a couple of mid-130s domestic bowler,” he added.

But then why is No. 6 better for Rohit in the third Test? The coach has a technical response for it.

“If you look at Rohit’s dismissals even in India, he is getting squared up more often than not. The reason being his front-foot stride is becoming shorter with age. For example, if you have pronounced front-foot side, say three feet, you are able to cut the angle of deviation of a delivery off the surface.

“But if your stride is just a foot and quarter, you are allowing the same delivery to shape in or shape out. So, a world-class bowler will attack both your inside edge and outside edge,” the coach, who is also a former opener, explained.

He then gave his reasons for why Rohit will be better off playing at No. 6 at the Gabba.

“To be fair, if your stride is shorter and reflexes on the wane, the Pink Kookaburra will make it even more difficult for you to survive. I think KL had said before the game that it comes a lot quicker than Red Kookaburra and it skids off the surface. 

“With his current footwork, the Red Kookaburra would again dart around and seam at the Gabba if he opens. If he comes in at No. 6, there is every chance that it will be either old or semi-old Kookaburra with suppressed seam and it won’t do much.

“He can play his customary attacking game and get quick runs. If he comes when the second new ball is taken, that means (Mitchell) Starc and (Pat) Cummins have both bowled 25 odd overs,” he elaborated his point.

But then Rohit was reasonably successful in England during the 2021 tour when he scored his only Test hundred in a SENA country — 127 at the Oval. If one watches his performance in that series, the front foot stride to cover the swing and seam movement was more pronounced than what one saw in the last few Tests.

Also in England, the ball deviates at a bigger angle compared to Australia and at times even with a shorter stride, one might just edge and miss.

Former national selector Devang Gandhi put forth a more lucid explanation.

“Just compare Rohit and Virat Kohli’s stance. Rohit has a wider stance and his stride won’t be big. Virat has a narrow stance and hence the front foot stride is that pronounced as you witness.

“Coming to Rohit’s batting position, No. 6 is correct call by team management. There isn’t enough data in SENA countries to suggest that he has had tremendous success as an opener,” he said.

Earlier former coach Ravi Shastri had said that he wants Rohit to come at the top as he looks too subdued in the middle-order.

“That’s the reason I want him at the top. That’s where he can be aggressive and expressive. Just thought he was a little too subdued, just seeing his body language,” Shastri told Star Sports.

Sunil Gavaskar echoed the sentiment.

“The fact that he didn’t make runs, I don’t think there was enough on the field there. I just wanted to see him more involved, and a little more animated,” Shastri said.

“He should return to his regular spot. We should remember why Rahul had opened. He did that because Rohit Sharma was not available for the first Test,” Gavaskar said on Sports Tak.

BGT 2024

‘Any conditions, any format, this guy’s a freak’ says Michael Clarke

Published

on

Former Australian captain Michael Clarke has termed the incomparable Jasprit Bumrah the greatest all-format fast bowler after his Player-of-the-Series performance in the Border-Gavaskar Trophy.

Bumrah produced one of the best-ever bowling performances by an overseas pacer in Australia and picked up 32 wickets over five Tests.

“The thing I’ve thought about Bumrah, after the series finished and I was sitting and thinking about his performances, I actually think he’s the best fast bowler ever across all three formats,” Clarke told ESPN.

“I know a lot of great fast bowlers, Curtly Ambrose, Glenn McGrath, didn’t get to play T20 cricket, so I’m not talking about those guys. But in regards to anyone who has played all three formats, I think he might be the best ever.

“He’s actually that good in any conditions, that’s what makes him great; any conditions, any format, this guy’s a freak.”

The former Australia captain believed that India could have won the series-deciding Sydney Test had Bumrah bowled in Australia’s second innings and some more runs under their belt.

Bumrah had suffered an injury on the second day of the match at SCG and was immediately taken to the hospital for a scan.

The Indian pace spearhead returned to bat the following morning but he did not bowl in Australia’s second innings because of a back spasm as the hosts successfully chased down a target of 162 with six wickets in hand to win the series 3-1.

“I reckon India were probably 20 runs short (in Sydney),” Clarke said.

“I reckon a 180 lead, with Bumrah in the team, I think India are home. I think Bumrah is that good… he’s so much better than the other bowlers they had in the team.”

Bumrah was in a league of his own as his 32 wickets came at an incredible average of 13.06 and a strike rate of 28.3.

Mohammed Siraj was the next highest wicket-taker among Indian pacers with 20 scalps at 31.15.

Continue Reading

BGT 2024

‘Virat brings theatre to the game’

Published

on

Australian skipper Pat Cummins rates Virat Kohli as a great competitor who makes the game lively with his theatrics and he will be “sad” if the latest Border-Gavaskar trophy does end up being the Indian superstar’s last tour Down Under.

Following the hundred in the series opener in Perth, Kohli’s troubles outside the off-stump compounded as he was caught in the slip cordon eight times over the course of five Tests.

The tour that got over on Sunday is likely to be Kohli’s last.

“It’s always been a a wonderful contest. More than just the runs that he scored, he brings a bit of theatre to the game which is sometimes good and sometimes it can rile you up as an opposition, which I’m sure is part of his plans,” Cummins said in a response to a PTI query after the six wicket win in Sydney.

“Really enjoyed playing with him. He’s been one of the the star batters for the last decade or so. If you get his wicket it goes a long way to winning a game. So yeah, it will be sad if it’s his last series.”

Cummins did admit that Bumrah’s absence on the final day of the series did help them, considering he took 32 wickets in the series.

“Every time he (Bumrah) bowled he seemed to have an impact and took some key wickets. So yeah, no doubt that (his absence) helped our chase a little bit.”

Although he termed it as Indian team’s internal matter, Cummins was a touch surprised with Rohit Sharma’s decision to drop himself from the playing eleven on account of poor form.

“I think you’re always surprised when the captain kind of doesn’t play. And you know, same with Ashwin retiring, but honestly it doesn’t really affect us at all.

“You just turn up and you see who’s going to be on the team sheet and you play whoever eleven they put out there. Honestly, it’s been very little conversation I’ve chatted with him about what’s going on there,” Cummins said.

He termed the win against India as “huge” in the context of the Indo-Australia bilaterals, having lost twice at home previously.

“No, it’s a huge win in the context of this series. It’s as big a series as you get to play at home. It felt like it was kind of see-sawing throughout the whole series. So to finish it 3-1 to hold the trophy is an amazing feeling,” Cummins said.

“…… and I think the extra layer is now securing a spot in the World Test Championship Final which was always a huge goal for us in this cycle.”

He has been a part of T20 World Cup winning squad, won the 50-over World Cup, World Test Championship mace and Ashes as the skipper and now the India series that his predecessor Tim Paine had lost twice.

When he was asked if he has any succession plan in place, he sidestepped the issue.

“First of all I just absolutely love what I do. So, I mean that’s probably the biggest driver in wanting to play Test Cricket and work with this team and support staff.”

So does he feel that he has done it all?

“Unfortunately, I have got to keep playing. We’ll stay on this side guys and then we’ll come over here,” he smiled.

Continue Reading

BGT 2024

Play Ranji or risk losing Test spots: Gavaskar warns

Published

on

Legendary Sunil Gavaskar on Sunday urged Indian batters to play in the Ranji Trophy without offering any excuses to iron out technical deficiencies that led to their peril in two successive series against New Zealand and Australia.

Gavaskar said it was worrying to see the Indian batters churning out underwhelming efforts against New Zealand at home and in the just-concluded series against Australia Down Under.

India succumbed to the Kiwis 0-3 before surrendering to the Aussies 1-3.

“On January 23, there is the next round of the Ranji Trophy. Let’s see how many players from this squad play. There should be no excuse for not being able to play,” Gavaskar told Star Sports.

“If you do not play those matches, Gautam Gambhir will have to take a few tough decisions against those who are not available for the Ranji Trophy,” he added.

“Gambhir should be saying: ‘you do not have that commitment. We need commitment. You are not playing. Whatever you want to do, do it. But for Indian cricket, you cannot return to the Test squad.”

Gavaskar said flaws have crept into Indian batsmen’s approach because of not playing domestic cricket on available opportunities.

“What I saw were technical deficiencies. If you have been making the same mistakes, and I am not just talking about this series. I am talking about the New Zealand series as well that did you do against New Zealand in India?”

Gavaskar said domestic cricket assumes importance in view of the upcoming 2025-2027 WTC cycle.

“And that’s why, now, because the next cycle will start in June, we have not qualified for the World Test Championship. From now on, we should be ready for it. If we have to take tough decisions, then we will have to take them,” he said.

With the next WTC cycle in focus, Gavaskar said India should now focus more on young cricketers such as Yashasvi Jaiswal and Nitish Kumar Reddy.

“They are hungry to earn a name for India and themselves. Such players are needed. You need such players who will protect their wicket like their life,” he noted.

“That’s why I’m interested that on January 23, in the Ranji Trophy matches, who will play? I want to see that.”

“Because at that time, there will be T20 matches against England. But those who are not playing T20, will they play Ranji Trophy matches or not?” he said.

Continue Reading

Trending